About Me 0052: Making Internet Money

Last night, for the second week in a row, The Simpsons took a shot at corporate cousin Fox News. However, if you’re clicking over to Hulu or Fox’s websites to check out this week’s helicopter gag, you’re going to be disappointed. WebNewser has noticed that the joke, from the episode’s opening credits, has been removed. Did someone at Fox (other than Bill O’Reilly) complain?

Well, maybe. However, as much as we love a good conspiracy, our money is on WebNewser’s second hypothesis, that the gag was added at the very last minute and after the websites had received their copy. We can easily imagine the producers of the show getting so excited about the media coverage of the first joke (and thoroughly enjoying O’Reilly’s take down of it) that they rushed to their computers to add the new joke to the next episode, which was finished long in advance of airing. Besides, as much as some might like to picture shadowy Fox executives wringing their hands over the joke, we just can’t imagine any exec exclaiming, “What? People are writing about our two-decade-old series all over the internet because of one joke?! Well dont let them do it again!”

However, you’d think that the TV channels would get the shows before the websites so you never know…

UPDATE Simpsons’ Executive Producer Al Jean revealed in an exclusive interview with the NY Times David Itzkoff that the motives behind the anti-Fox News gag were light in spirit:

Mr. Jean said the “Simpsons” producers — in particular, the creator of the series, Matt Groening — were pleased with how the first Fox News joke seemed to ruffle the feathers of Bill O’Reilly, the host of the Fox News program “The O’Reilly Factor.” (On his show last week, Mr. O’Reilly played the “Simpsons” satire of Fox News and, with a smile, said of the cartoon family: “Pinheads? I believe so.”)

The “Simpsons” producers could not let that remark stand, so they rushed their second Fox News joke into Sunday’s episode — so late in the production process that the gag could only be inserted into the version shown in North America, but not into versions shown in foreign markets or on the Internet.

“There’s a lot of masters that go out,” Mr. Jean said in a telephone interview, “so to save money we just put it in the one master that’s for the U.S. and Canada. More money that will then go to Fox News and undoubtedly to Bill O’Reilly.”

Mr. Jean emphasized that neither he nor his “Simpsons” colleagues have ever been told by their corporate Fox parents to stop making fun of Fox News.

Check out the opening from Fox below as well as the Hulu version below that:

What drives an entrepreneur to start a business? Is it solely about money? Or is there something more? I argue that often it is the same creative drive that compels an artist to paint, a musician to compose, or a sculptor to look at a piece of rough marble and see an angel inside. And those who understand the mind of the small business owner know why the proposed tax increase in 2011 will do more harm than good to the very people this economy needs most to create jobs.

On FBN’s Bulls & Bears recently Democratic strategist Jehmu Greene, the token liberal steak tossed into the wolf den of laissez faire commentators, uttered words to the effect that if we allow the Bush tax cuts to remain, the “rich” (I guess that’s me?) will not put the money into the economy but rather just squirrel it away “in their banks…It would not go into job creation or creating capital for small business.”

My first thought was: “In my bank? Really? How many businesses have you owned?” (To be fair she did co-found some internet venture called Urban Hang Suite which shuttered in 2003). But then I reminded myself that, like Ms. Greene herself who has been in non-profit and/or government almost her entire career, very few people in the Obama administration, from the president on down, have ever started a business. Thus they cannot understand what drives entrepreneurs to succeed. They think it is just about take-home pay.

It’s said that small business owners work eighteen hour days for ourselves so we don’t have to work eight hours a day for someone else. And often our income on a dollar/hour basis is less than the established firms we may have left to go on our own. Certainly this is generally true for those few scary years at the beginning when a myriad of mistakes are made and unanticipated events occur that prompt the principals to pay ourselves only after all other obligations have been met So why do it? Why take such risk?

First, the sense of pride of ownership and having built something from nothing is as strong in an entrepreneur as it is in the artists I alluded to earlier. This is often a foreign concept to those who have spent their lives in secure positions in academia, government, or as line workers and middle managers in huge firms and thus do they discount our passion to create something while passing judgments like Ms. Greene’s. Do not underestimate the fact that more than just money drives us to take such enormous personal risk.

Secondly, there is of course that brass ring of selling the firm and walking away with a nice pay-out in hand. Still, I know of very few successful entrepreneurs who upon a sale leave the world of business. Rather they look for new ventures. New challenges. New job creating entities. Name an artist satisfied at just one piece.

Now, our company’s value is enhanced by increased business. We have to grow in order to build our firm into a salable entity. And that usually means a larger workforce to generate more revenues. It’s no coincidence that the targeted 2% of Americans making north of $250k create 28% of the nation’s new jobs. The reason letting the tax breaks expire is an impediment to that growth is that many small business owners have their business and personal income intertwined. And as such a 5% tax on their personal income is a de facto 5% surcharge on their business. For someone making $1mm a year, that is a $50k hit to their business…two entry level employees. In the end, we are employers, not charity wards. We take the risks, it is our capital—and homes—at stake and so we will look to other ways to cut before reducing our own deserved compensation. So in order to make up the shortfall and keep an owner level with 2010 all else being equal, these two employees may get let go. Certainly an owner will put off hiring until he/she knows if they can afford new hands or not. The new mantra for small business is “don’t hire one until you need two.” Not the best recipe for getting the job creators excited about growing the payroll is it?

Before sitting down to write this I looked over my small company’s five-year projections. Always we try to gage our fixed costs. When we have some certainty on costs we can plan around them and ‘stress test’ to see how we survive in given revenue scenarios and prepare measures today in anticipation of any issues down the road. Then we can better tell, for example, how much interest we can afford each month on a loan (assuming we can get one) to bring in more capital and expand the firm—and hire people we need to get us to the next level and that much closer to that holy grail of being bought out while satisfying our desire to build something special along the way. But right now there is a big blank “N/A” on the spreadheet cells labeled “Federal Income Tax.” Until I know what to plug in there, it will be hard to move forward.

bench craft company rip off

This Week in Credit Card News - MoneyBuilder - making sense of ...

Provided by LowCards.com More Than Eight Million People Drop Out of Credit Card Use More than eight million consumers stopped using credit cards over the past year, according to a new study by TransUnion. The use of general purpose ...

NMA News | Simpsons | Simpsons Fox News | Mediaite

Taiwan's NMA News has taken on the battle between The Simpsons over at Fox Broadcasting and their conservative corporate cousins at Fox News, depicting both of The Simpsons recent attacks on the network as well as Bill O'Reilly's ...

Breaking News: Watch A Gigantic Looping Solar Prominence

The Solar Dynamics Observatory never fails to deliver absolutely stunning images from the Sun: as of 18:49 UT today, the above picture is what the Sun looked like in the ultraviolet spectrum. The prominence that you are seeing looping ...

bench craft company rip off

This Week in Credit Card News - MoneyBuilder - making sense of ...

NMA News | Simpsons | Simpsons Fox News | Mediaite

Breaking News: Watch A Gigantic Looping Solar Prominence

bench craft company rip off

This Week in Credit Card News - MoneyBuilder - making sense of ...

NMA News | Simpsons | Simpsons Fox News | Mediaite

Breaking News: Watch A Gigantic Looping Solar Prominence

bench craft company rip off
Esta semana en la tarjeta de crédito Noticias - MoneyBuilder - sentido de lo que Siempre ... por LowCards.com más de ocho millones de personas abandonan la tarjeta de crédito utilizar más de ocho millones de consumidores dejaron de usar las tarjetas de crédito durante el año pasado, según un nuevo estudio de TransUnion. El uso de propósito general ...

NMA Noticias | Los Simpson | Los Simpson Fox Noticias | NMA MediaiteTaiwan News ha dado a la batalla entre Los Simpson en la Fox Broadcasting y sus primos corporativos conservadora de Fox News , que representa tanto de los ataques recientes Simpson en la red, así como Bill O'Reilly ...

Rompiendo Noticias : un gigantesco reloj solar Lazo ProminenceThe Observatorio de Dinámica Solar nunca deja de ofrecer imágenes absolutamente impresionante desde el Sol: de 18:49 UT hoy en día, la imagen de arriba es lo que el Sol parecía en el espectro ultravioleta. La importancia que está viendo en bucle ...

bench craft company rip off

Mr. Jean said the “Simpsons” producers — in particular, the creator of the series, Matt Groening — were pleased with how the first Fox News joke seemed to ruffle the feathers of Bill O’Reilly, the host of the Fox News program “The O’Reilly Factor.” (On his show last week, Mr. O’Reilly played the “Simpsons” satire of Fox News and, with a smile, said of the cartoon family: “Pinheads? I believe so.”)

The “Simpsons” producers could not let that remark stand, so they rushed their second Fox News joke into Sunday’s episode — so late in the production process that the gag could only be inserted into the version shown in North America, but not into versions shown in foreign markets or on the Internet.

“There’s a lot of masters that go out,” Mr. Jean said in a telephone interview, “so to save money we just put it in the one master that’s for the U.S. and Canada. More money that will then go to Fox News and undoubtedly to Bill O’Reilly.”

Mr. Jean emphasized that neither he nor his “Simpsons” colleagues have ever been told by their corporate Fox parents to stop making fun of Fox News.

Check out the opening from Fox below as well as the Hulu version below that:

What drives an entrepreneur to start a business? Is it solely about money? Or is there something more? I argue that often it is the same creative drive that compels an artist to paint, a musician to compose, or a sculptor to look at a piece of rough marble and see an angel inside. And those who understand the mind of the small business owner know why the proposed tax increase in 2011 will do more harm than good to the very people this economy needs most to create jobs.

On FBN’s Bulls & Bears recently Democratic strategist Jehmu Greene, the token liberal steak tossed into the wolf den of laissez faire commentators, uttered words to the effect that if we allow the Bush tax cuts to remain, the “rich” (I guess that’s me?) will not put the money into the economy but rather just squirrel it away “in their banks…It would not go into job creation or creating capital for small business.”

My first thought was: “In my bank? Really? How many businesses have you owned?” (To be fair she did co-found some internet venture called Urban Hang Suite which shuttered in 2003). But then I reminded myself that, like Ms. Greene herself who has been in non-profit and/or government almost her entire career, very few people in the Obama administration, from the president on down, have ever started a business. Thus they cannot understand what drives entrepreneurs to succeed. They think it is just about take-home pay.

It’s said that small business owners work eighteen hour days for ourselves so we don’t have to work eight hours a day for someone else. And often our income on a dollar/hour basis is less than the established firms we may have left to go on our own. Certainly this is generally true for those few scary years at the beginning when a myriad of mistakes are made and unanticipated events occur that prompt the principals to pay ourselves only after all other obligations have been met So why do it? Why take such risk?

First, the sense of pride of ownership and having built something from nothing is as strong in an entrepreneur as it is in the artists I alluded to earlier. This is often a foreign concept to those who have spent their lives in secure positions in academia, government, or as line workers and middle managers in huge firms and thus do they discount our passion to create something while passing judgments like Ms. Greene’s. Do not underestimate the fact that more than just money drives us to take such enormous personal risk.

Secondly, there is of course that brass ring of selling the firm and walking away with a nice pay-out in hand. Still, I know of very few successful entrepreneurs who upon a sale leave the world of business. Rather they look for new ventures. New challenges. New job creating entities. Name an artist satisfied at just one piece.

Now, our company’s value is enhanced by increased business. We have to grow in order to build our firm into a salable entity. And that usually means a larger workforce to generate more revenues. It’s no coincidence that the targeted 2% of Americans making north of $250k create 28% of the nation’s new jobs. The reason letting the tax breaks expire is an impediment to that growth is that many small business owners have their business and personal income intertwined. And as such a 5% tax on their personal income is a de facto 5% surcharge on their business. For someone making $1mm a year, that is a $50k hit to their business…two entry level employees. In the end, we are employers, not charity wards. We take the risks, it is our capital—and homes—at stake and so we will look to other ways to cut before reducing our own deserved compensation. So in order to make up the shortfall and keep an owner level with 2010 all else being equal, these two employees may get let go. Certainly an owner will put off hiring until he/she knows if they can afford new hands or not. The new mantra for small business is “don’t hire one until you need two.” Not the best recipe for getting the job creators excited about growing the payroll is it?

Before sitting down to write this I looked over my small company’s five-year projections. Always we try to gage our fixed costs. When we have some certainty on costs we can plan around them and ‘stress test’ to see how we survive in given revenue scenarios and prepare measures today in anticipation of any issues down the road. Then we can better tell, for example, how much interest we can afford each month on a loan (assuming we can get one) to bring in more capital and expand the firm—and hire people we need to get us to the next level and that much closer to that holy grail of being bought out while satisfying our desire to build something special along the way. But right now there is a big blank “N/A” on the spreadheet cells labeled “Federal Income Tax.” Until I know what to plug in there, it will be hard to move forward.

bench craft company rip off

Mr. Jean said the “Simpsons” producers — in particular, the creator of the series, Matt Groening — were pleased with how the first Fox News joke seemed to ruffle the feathers of Bill O’Reilly, the host of the Fox News program “The O’Reilly Factor.” (On his show last week, Mr. O’Reilly played the “Simpsons” satire of Fox News and, with a smile, said of the cartoon family: “Pinheads? I believe so.”)

The “Simpsons” producers could not let that remark stand, so they rushed their second Fox News joke into Sunday’s episode — so late in the production process that the gag could only be inserted into the version shown in North America, but not into versions shown in foreign markets or on the Internet.

“There’s a lot of masters that go out,” Mr. Jean said in a telephone interview, “so to save money we just put it in the one master that’s for the U.S. and Canada. More money that will then go to Fox News and undoubtedly to Bill O’Reilly.”

Mr. Jean emphasized that neither he nor his “Simpsons” colleagues have ever been told by their corporate Fox parents to stop making fun of Fox News.

Check out the opening from Fox below as well as the Hulu version below that:

What drives an entrepreneur to start a business? Is it solely about money? Or is there something more? I argue that often it is the same creative drive that compels an artist to paint, a musician to compose, or a sculptor to look at a piece of rough marble and see an angel inside. And those who understand the mind of the small business owner know why the proposed tax increase in 2011 will do more harm than good to the very people this economy needs most to create jobs.

On FBN’s Bulls & Bears recently Democratic strategist Jehmu Greene, the token liberal steak tossed into the wolf den of laissez faire commentators, uttered words to the effect that if we allow the Bush tax cuts to remain, the “rich” (I guess that’s me?) will not put the money into the economy but rather just squirrel it away “in their banks…It would not go into job creation or creating capital for small business.”

My first thought was: “In my bank? Really? How many businesses have you owned?” (To be fair she did co-found some internet venture called Urban Hang Suite which shuttered in 2003). But then I reminded myself that, like Ms. Greene herself who has been in non-profit and/or government almost her entire career, very few people in the Obama administration, from the president on down, have ever started a business. Thus they cannot understand what drives entrepreneurs to succeed. They think it is just about take-home pay.

It’s said that small business owners work eighteen hour days for ourselves so we don’t have to work eight hours a day for someone else. And often our income on a dollar/hour basis is less than the established firms we may have left to go on our own. Certainly this is generally true for those few scary years at the beginning when a myriad of mistakes are made and unanticipated events occur that prompt the principals to pay ourselves only after all other obligations have been met So why do it? Why take such risk?

First, the sense of pride of ownership and having built something from nothing is as strong in an entrepreneur as it is in the artists I alluded to earlier. This is often a foreign concept to those who have spent their lives in secure positions in academia, government, or as line workers and middle managers in huge firms and thus do they discount our passion to create something while passing judgments like Ms. Greene’s. Do not underestimate the fact that more than just money drives us to take such enormous personal risk.

Secondly, there is of course that brass ring of selling the firm and walking away with a nice pay-out in hand. Still, I know of very few successful entrepreneurs who upon a sale leave the world of business. Rather they look for new ventures. New challenges. New job creating entities. Name an artist satisfied at just one piece.

Now, our company’s value is enhanced by increased business. We have to grow in order to build our firm into a salable entity. And that usually means a larger workforce to generate more revenues. It’s no coincidence that the targeted 2% of Americans making north of $250k create 28% of the nation’s new jobs. The reason letting the tax breaks expire is an impediment to that growth is that many small business owners have their business and personal income intertwined. And as such a 5% tax on their personal income is a de facto 5% surcharge on their business. For someone making $1mm a year, that is a $50k hit to their business…two entry level employees. In the end, we are employers, not charity wards. We take the risks, it is our capital—and homes—at stake and so we will look to other ways to cut before reducing our own deserved compensation. So in order to make up the shortfall and keep an owner level with 2010 all else being equal, these two employees may get let go. Certainly an owner will put off hiring until he/she knows if they can afford new hands or not. The new mantra for small business is “don’t hire one until you need two.” Not the best recipe for getting the job creators excited about growing the payroll is it?

Before sitting down to write this I looked over my small company’s five-year projections. Always we try to gage our fixed costs. When we have some certainty on costs we can plan around them and ‘stress test’ to see how we survive in given revenue scenarios and prepare measures today in anticipation of any issues down the road. Then we can better tell, for example, how much interest we can afford each month on a loan (assuming we can get one) to bring in more capital and expand the firm—and hire people we need to get us to the next level and that much closer to that holy grail of being bought out while satisfying our desire to build something special along the way. But right now there is a big blank “N/A” on the spreadheet cells labeled “Federal Income Tax.” Until I know what to plug in there, it will be hard to move forward.

bench craft company rip off

Monday, 6 December 2010

Making Internet Money

No comments:

Post a Comment